CAN A FORUM SELECTION CLAUSE PRECLUDE SHAREHOLDERS’ FROM ASSERTING FEDERAL CLAIMS?


Late last year, a verified shareholder derivative complaint was filed against The Boeing Co. (“Boeing”) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.  See Seafarers Pension Plan v. Bradway et al., Docket No. 1:19-cv-08095 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 11, 2019).  The complaint alleged breaches of fiduciary duty against the Boeing directors and officers under state law, as well as asserted claims under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”).

Since 2011, Boeing’s bylaws have contained a forum selection clause which mandates that all shareholder derivative suits must be litigated in Delaware Chancery Court.  A forum selection clause is not uncommon and Delaware courts have routinely found these clauses to be valid.  Accordingly, Boeing moved to dismiss the Illinois case based on the applicability of the forum selection clause.  Seafarers Pension Plan (“Seafarers”) argued that enforcement of the forum selection clause would deprive shareholders the right to assert claims under the Exchange Act because these claims must be exclusively brought in a federal court; however, the district court granted Boeing’s motion to dismiss and Seafarers is currently appealing.  See Seafarers Pension Plan v. Bradway et al., Docket No. 20-02244 (7th Cir. Jul. 9, 2020).

In addition to appealing to the 7th Circuit, Seafarers is also pursuing an action against Boeing and its directors and officers in Delaware Chancery Court.  See Seafarers Pension Plan v. Bradway et al., Docket No. 2020-0556 (Del. Ch. Jul 8, 2020).  The Chancery Court suit alleges that Boeing’s forum selection clause violates Delaware General Corporation Law, and is therefore, invalid and unenforceable because the forum selection clause precludes shareholders from bringing “derivative claims under the Exchange Act or any other exclusively federal law claim.”  Further, the Chancery Court suit alleges that Boeing’s directors and officers are breaching their fiduciary duties by enforcing the forum selection clause.  Among other things, Seafarers is seeking a declaration from the Chancery Court declaring that Boeing’s forum selection clause cannot be enforced.
 

About Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP focuses on complex civil litigation, including securities, antitrust, wage and hour and consumer class actions as well as shareholder derivative and merger and transactional litigation. The firm is headquartered in New York, and maintains offices in California, Georgia and Pennsylvania.

Since its founding in 1995, Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP has served as lead or co-lead counsel in numerous high-profile cases which ultimately provided significant recoveries to investors, direct purchasers, consumers and employees.

To schedule a free consultation with our attorneys and to learn more about your legal rights, call our offices today at (877) 247-4292 or (212) 983-9330.

Tags: faruqi & faruqi, investigation, news, litigation, settlement notice, case, faruqi law, faruqi blog, faruqilaw, Christopher M. Lash, derivative litigation Faruqi & Faruqi Faruqi & Faruqi

New York office
Tel: (212) 983-9330
Fax: (212) 983-9331

Finding us

Our Offices


Our offices are nationwide. If you have any questions about a case or our firm, please contact us.

New York

685 Third Avenue 26th Floor
New York, New York 10017
(212) 983-9330
(877) 247-4292
(212) 983-9331

California

1901 Avenue of the Stars Suite 1060
Los Angeles, California 90067
(424) 256-2884
(424) 256-2885

Georgia

3565 Piedmont Road NE Building Four, Suite 380
Atlanta, Georgia 30305
(404) 847-0617
(404) 506-9534

Pennsylvania

1617 JFK Boulevard, Suite 1550
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103
(215) 277-5770
(215) 277-5771

Faruqi & Faruqi office in New York, New York

Faruqi & Faruqi office in Los Angeles, California

Faruqi & Faruqi office in Atlanta, Georgia

Faruqi & Faruqi office in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania