Caremark Duties Include Duty Not Only to Establish Oversight Processes but Also to Monitor Them


In Marchand v. Barnhill, 212 A.2d 805 (Del. 2019) the Delaware Supreme Court held that boards that fail to implement oversight procedures for their company’s mission critical functions can be held liable for breach of their fiduciary duty, reversing and remanding the Delaware Chancery Court’s dismissal of the case. See Marchand v. Barnhill, C.A. No 2017-0586-JRS, 2018 WL 4657159 (Del. C. Sept. 27, 2018). In a recent decision on October 1, 2019, the Delaware Chancery Court provided additional perspective on directors’ potential liability for breaches of the duty of oversight. 

In In re Clovis Oncology, Inc. Derivative Litigation, C.A. No 2017-0222-JRS (Del. C. Oct. 1, 2019), the Delaware Chancery Court provided additional color on directors’ potential liability for breach of the duty of oversight. The Chancery Court held, citing Marchand, that a board of directors not only must be able to demonstrate good faith efforts to implement an oversight system, but also that the board monitors the system – especially when the company operates in a highly regulated industry. The Marchand decision and its progeny, Clovis Oncology, “underscores the importance of the board’s oversight function when the company is operating in the midst of a ‘mission critical’ regulatory compliance program.” The court in Clovis Oncology noted that Marchand “makes clear” that where a company operates in a “mission critical” regulatory environment, “the board’s oversight function must be more rigorously exercised.” In summary, having a compliance system is not enough; the board must implement procedures in place to “ensure that the board itself monitors ‘mission control’ corporate risks.” These rulings give the board, management and shareholders additional guidance for potential director liability for oversight claims. 

https://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=295870
 

About Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP focuses on complex civil litigation, including securities, antitrust, wage and hour, personal injury and consumer class actions as well as shareholder derivative and merger and transactional litigation. The firm is headquartered in New York, and maintains offices in California, Delaware, Georgia and Pennsylvania.

Since its founding in 1995, Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP has served as lead or co-lead counsel in numerous high-profile cases which ultimately provided significant recoveries to investors, direct purchasers, consumers and employees.

To schedule a free consultation with our attorneys and to learn more about your legal rights, call our offices today at (877) 247-4292 or (212) 983-9330.

About Stuart J. Guber

Stuart J. Guber is a Partner in Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP's Pennsylvania office.

Tags: faruqi & faruqi, faruqilaw, Caremark, shareholder, board of directors, derivative, lawsuit, law firm, attorneys, lawyers, delaware court of chancery Stuart J. Guber Stuart J. Guber
Partner at Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP

Pennsylvania office
Tel: (215) 277-5770
Fax: (215) 277-5771
E-mail: sguber@faruqilaw.com

Finding us

Our Offices


Our offices are nationwide. If you have any questions about a case or our firm, please contact us.

New York

685 Third Avenue 26th Floor
New York, New York 10017
(212) 983-9330
(877) 247-4292
(212) 983-9331

California

10866 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1470
Los Angeles, California 90024
(424) 256-2884
(424) 256-2885

Delaware

3828 Kennett Pike Suite 201
Wilmington, Delaware 19807
(302) 482-3182
(302) 482-3612

Georgia

3975 Roswell Rd Suite A
Atlanta, Georgia 30342
(404) 847-0617
(404) 506-9534

Pennsylvania

1617 JFK Boulevard, Suite 1550
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103
(215) 277-5770
(215) 277-5771

Faruqi & Faruqi office in New York, New York

Faruqi & Faruqi office in Los Angeles, California

Faruqi & Faruqi office in Wilmington, Delaware

Faruqi & Faruqi office in Atlanta, Georgia

Faruqi & Faruqi office in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania