Faruqi and Faruqui, LLP Logo
Share this page

Most Recent Cases

Page 67 of 67 (1331 Items)
12
Mar
2008

In re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust Litigation, No. 08-MD-1935 (M.D. Pa.)

In re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust Litigation, No. 08-MD-1935 (M.D. Pa.) (representing some of the largest chain grocery and drug stores challenging conspiracy among the leading chocolate manufacturers to fix prices, in violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act).

11
Mar
2008

In re Pennsylvania Title Ins. Antitrust Litigation, No. 08-1202 (E.D. Pa.)

In the Pennsylvania Title Insurance Antitrust Litigation, Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP represents a class of direct purchasers of title insurance, who allege that title insurers in Pennsylvania utilized a rating agency (called the Title Insurance Rating Bureau of Pennsylvania) to facilitate a cartel and impose illegal cartel pricing on policyholders... READ MORE

31
May
2007

Jimico Enterprises, Inc., et al. v. Lehigh Gas Corp., No. 07-578 (N.D.N.Y.)

In this case involving the operators of gas stations on the New York State Thruway, Faruqi & Faruqi represents several terminated gas stations alleging illegal terminations in violation of the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act.  After partial summary judgment was granted to plaintiffs, a damages hearing was held wherein plaintiffs were... READ MORE

19
Mar
2007

Marchbanks Truck Service, Inc., et al. v. Comdata Network, Inc., et al., No. 07-1078-JKG-HSP (E.D. Pa.)

Faruqi & Faruqi represents a proposed class of independent truck stops against fleet card issuer Comdata and the largest chain truck stops in the United States for abuse of monopoly power and tying and bundling in violation of §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act.  Plaintiffs allege that the... READ MORE

12
Mar
2007

Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc., et al. v. Braintree Labs, Inc., No. 07-142 (D. Del.)

In this case, nicknamed the MiraLax case, Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP represents a pharmaceutical wholesaler and a settlement class of direct purchasers of Braintree’s branded drug, MiraLax (polyethylene glycol 3350).  The case alleges that Braintree, to forestall competition from less-expensive generic versions of MiraLax, hatched an anticompetitive scheme that included... READ MORE

05
Jun
2006

In re Metoprolol Succinate Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation, No. 06-52 (D. Del.)

In the Toprol case, Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP represents a pharmaceutical wholesaler and a class of direct purchasers of AstraZeneca’s branded drug Toprol XL (extended-release metoprolol succinate).  The case alleges that AstraZeneca fraudulently procured two patents and filed multiple baseless patent infringement lawsuits using those patents, solely in an effort... READ MORE

27
Apr
2006

King Drug Company of Florence, Inc., et al. v. Cephalon, Inc., et al., No. 06-1797 (E.D. Pa.)

In this case, nicknamed Provigil, Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP represents a pharmaceutical wholesaler and a proposed class of direct purchasers of Cephalon’s (now Teva’s) branded wakefulness drug, Provigil (modafinil).  The case alleges that that the brand manufacturer, Cephalon, conspired with 4 generic competitors not to launch their generic versions of... READ MORE

28
Dec
2005

Babyage.com, Inc., et al. v. Toys "R" Us, Inc., No. 05-6792 (E.D. Pa.)

In Babyage.com, Inc., et al. v. Toys “R” Us, Inc., et al., Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP represented three internet retailers of baby products, who challenged a dominant retailer’s anticompetitive scheme, in concert with co-conspirator manufacturers, to impose and enforce resale price maintenance in violation of §§ 1 and 2 of... READ MORE

11
Aug
2005

In re Tricor Antitrust Litigation, No. 05-360 (D. Del.)

Faruqi & Faruqi represented PacifiCare, and other large third-party payors challenging the conduct of Abbott Laboratories and Laboratories Fournier in suppressing generic drug competition, in violation of §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act. The Tricor case settled for undisclosed amount in 2010.

30
Jun
2005

In re Ready-Mixed Concrete Antitrust Litigation, No. 05-979 (S.D. Ind.)

Faruqi & Faruqi represented a class of direct purchasers of ready-mixed concrete challenging conspiracy to fix prices in the Indianapolis market, in violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act.  This price fixing case settled in 2009 in excess of $40 million.

01
Mar
2005

In re Hypodermic Products Antitrust Litigation, No. 05-1602 (D.N.J.)

In the In re Hypodermic Products Antitrust Litigation, Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP represents a proposed class of direct purchasers of hypodermic products (needles, syringes, blood collection devices, catheters, etc.), who are challenging a bundled pricing and exclusionary contracting scheme by Becton Dickinson and Company.  Following appellate practice with a competing... READ MORE

Page 67 of 67 (1331 Items)