Faruqi and Faruqui, LLP Logo
Share this page

Most Recent Cases

Page 23 of 24 (474 Items)
07
Jul
2010

Jarosz v. St. Mary Medical Center et al., No. 10-cv-03330 (E.D. Pa.)

On July 7, 2010 Faruqi & Faruqi filed a class and collective action complaint against St. Mary Medical Center alleging it failed to pay its nurses and other direct patient care providers for all hours worked, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act.  The... READ MORE

30
Jun
2010

In re Iowa Ready-Mixed Concrete Antitrust Litigation, No. C 10-4038 (N.D. Ia.)

Faruqi & Faruqi represented a class of direct purchasers alleging producers and sellers of ready-mixed concrete conspired to fix prices in violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act.  This case settled for $18.5 million in 2011.

10
Jun
2010

Galimba v. Amedisys, Inc., No. 3:10-cv-00395 (M.D. La.)

In Amedisys, Plaintiffs allege that Defendants violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) by continuing to permit the company’s 401(k) plan to acquire and hold Amedisys common stock when such an investment was no longer prudent for retirement savings due to the company’s questionable Medicare billing practices. ... READ MORE

07
Jun
2010

In re Prandin Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation, No. 10-cv-12141 (E.D. Mich.)

In the Prandin case, Faruqi & Faruqi represent a pharmaceutical wholesaler and a proposed class of direct purchasers of Novo Nordisk’s branded diabetes drug Prandin (repaglinide).   The case alleges that Novo Nordisk engaged in an overarching anticompetitive scheme to block less-expensive generic Prandin competition and thereby force direct purchasers to... READ MORE

30
Apr
2010

Marchese v. Cablevision Systems Corporation, No. 2:10-cv-02190 (D.N.J.)

Marchese v. Cablevision Systems Corporation, No. 2:10-cv-02190 (D.N.J.) (representing a proposed class of direct purchasers of two-way cable services from Cablevision, accusing Cablevision of illegally tying those services to rentals of a Cablevision-supplied set-top box)

31
Mar
2010

Mark S. Wallach, et al. v. Eaton Corp., et al., No. 10-260 (D. Del.)

In the Wallach case, Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP represents a proposed class of purchasers of Class 8 truck transmissions — the types of transmissions used in 18-wheelers.  The case alleges that the dominant manufacturer of the transmissions, Eaton Corporation, and several truck manufacturers, engaged in an exclusive dealing conspiracy that... READ MORE

01
Mar
2010

Anish v. National Securities, No. 9:10-cv-80330 (S.D. Fla.)

In National Securities, Plaintiff alleges that a nationwide securities brokerage company improperly classified its securities brokers as “independent contractors” and consequently failed to pay Plaintiff and similarly situated individuals overtime compensation for weeks where they worked in excess of forty hours.  Mr. Wells, on behalf of Plaintiff and a proposed... READ MORE

12
Feb
2010

Isaac Industries, Inc. v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, et al., No. 10-00323-RDB (D. Md.)

Faruqi & Faruqi represents a proposed class of direct purchasers challenging a conspiracy, by the leading suppliers of Titanium Dioxide in the U.S. and the world,  to fix prices and allocate markets for Titanium Dioxide, in violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act.  Plaintiffs have alleged that defendants E.I.... READ MORE

20
Jan
2010

DeMarco v. Northwestern Memorial Healthcare, No. 10-cv-00397 (N.D. Ill.)

On January 20, 2010 Faruqi & Faruqi filed a class and collective action complaint against Northwestern Memorial alleging it failed to pay its nurses and other direct patient care providers for all hours worked, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Illinois Minimum Wage Act.  On August 10,... READ MORE

12
Jan
2010

Bergman v. Kindred Healthcare Inc., et al., No. 1:10-cv-00191 (N.D. Ill.)

In Kindred, Plaintiffs allege that a nationwide network of hospitals failed to pay its hourly-paid employees, including nurses, for all time worked.  Mr. Wells and his co-counsel have moved for nationwide conditional certification of the federal claims and class certification pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 of the Illinois... READ MORE

04
Jan
2010

Cook v. St. John Health, et al., No. 2:10-cv-10016 (E.D. Mich.)

In St. John Health, Plaintiff alleges that a regional network of facilities in the Detroit, Michigan area failed to pay its registered nurses for all time worked.  This case is has been conditionally certified as a collective action and Mr. Wells and his co-counsel are currently engaged in stage two-discovery... READ MORE

04
Dec
2009

Symzyck v. Genesis Healthcare Corp., No. 09-cv-5782 (E.D. Pa.)

In Genesis, Plaintiff alleges that a healthcare facility failed to pay its hourly-paid employees, including nurses, for all time worked.  This case is currently back in the district court after Mr. Wells and his co-counsel successfully had a prior adverse ruling from the district court overturned by the United States... READ MORE

13
Nov
2009

Rhodes v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, et al, No. 09-5378 (N.D. Cal.)

Faruqi & Faruqi represents a proposed class of Division 1 college athletes and former athletes against the NCAA and its licensing agent alleging conspiracy to preclude athletes from profiting from use of their images in violation of  § 1 of the Sherman Act.

15
Sep
2009

In re: Packaged Ice Antitrust Litigation, Case No. 08-MD-01952

Plaintiffs allege Defendants (Reddy Ice, Arctic Glacier, and Home City Ice), the three largest companies in the United States that manufacture and distribute packaged ice, conspired not to compete with each other in violation of the federal antitrust laws.

29
Jun
2009

Connecticut Children’s Medical Center v. Lundbeck, Inc., No. 09-1652 (D. Minn.)

Faruqi & Faruqi represented a class of direct purchasers of drugs Indocin and NeoProfen alleging monopolization under §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act and § 7 of the Clayton Act. This case settled in 2011.

02
Jun
2009

In re Blood Reagents Antitrust Litigation, No. 09-2081 (E.D. Pa.)

In the Blood Reagents price fixing case, Faruqi & Faruqi represents a proposed class of direct purchasers of blood reagent products, challenging conspiracy to fix prices, in violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act.  Plaintiffs have alleged that defendants Immucor and Ortho-Clinics Diagnostics, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson,... READ MORE

01
Jun
2009

In re Delta/AirTran Baggage Fee Antitrust Litigation, No. 09-MD-2089 (N.D. Ga.)

Faruqi & Faruqi represents a proposed class of direct purchasers challenging conspiracy to fix baggage fees by two major airlines, in violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act.

03
Feb
2009

In re AndroGel Antitrust Litigation (II), 09-md-2084 (N.D. Ga.)

In the Androgel litigation, Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP represent a pharmaceutical wholesaler and a proposed class of direct purchasers of Abbott’s branded testosterone drug, AndroGel.  The case alleges that Abbott’s predecessor filed baseless patent litigation and entered a series of horizontal market allocation agreements with generic manufacturers Watson and Par/Paddock... READ MORE

09
Jan
2009

In re Online DVD Rental Antitrust Litigation, No. 09-2029 (N.D. Cal.)

Faruqi & Faruqi represents a class of subscribers to Netflix alleging a per se illegal market allocation agreement between it and Wal-Mart.  Plaintiffs alleged a scheme where Walmart agreed with Netflix to stay out of the DVD rental business in exchange for Netflix staying of the DVD sales business.  Plaintiffs... READ MORE

23
Oct
2008

In re Text Messaging Antitrust Litigation, No. 08-C-782 (N.D. Ill.)

Faruqi & Faruqi represents a proposed class of direct purchasers who paid a fee per text message, and who allege that Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile conspired among themselves and with others to fix the price of these fees.  Plaintiffs allege a conspiracy in violation of § 1 of the Sherman... READ MORE

Page 23 of 24 (474 Items)